2026-08-05
1 篇
MameLoshnLM:意第绪语语言模型与评测基准
HF 热门
中相关
预训练数据continual/mid-training评测基准
MameLoshnLM: Yiddish Language Model and Evaluation Benchmark
判定:构建意第绪语预训练语料并继续预训练Llama 3.1 8B
针对意第绪语数字资源稀缺和评测缺失问题,作者构建了高质量预训练语料Oytser和多任务基准Kashes。基于该语料对Llama 3.1 8B进行继续预训练得到MameLoshnLM。该模型在基准上超越同规模开源基线,并更好捕捉意第绪语形态句法特征。
- 发布高质量意第绪语预训练语料Oytser
- 基于Llama 3.1 8B进行继续预训练得到MameLoshnLM
- 构建Kashes基准验证低资源语言噪声数据缺陷
📄 2608.05850
▲ 10
💬 2
📅 2026-08-05
✍ Uri Katz 等 5 人
We present MameLoshnLM, the first open-source 8B-parameter language model built specifically for Yiddish. Despite Yiddish's rich textual tradition, its limited digital presence and the scarcity of reliable evaluation resources have constrained progress in Yiddish language modeling. Existing multilingual corpora and benchmarks are often poor proxies for the language, containing substantial amounts of noisy, machine-translated, and misclassified text. We address these gaps by introducing Oytser, a high-quality Yiddish pretraining corpus that combines contemporary web-native sources with literary materials, and Kashes, a multi-task benchmark spanning translation, linguistic analysis, information extraction, and language understanding. Using these resources, we continue pretraining Llama 3.1 8B to obtain MameLoshnLM. Across the tasks in the benchmark, MameLoshnLM outperforms open baselines of similar scale. Our analyses show that these gains are not only quantitative: relative to general-purpose multilingual models, MameLoshnLM better captures language-defining lexical and morphological patterns, pointing to a broader failure mode of noisy web-scale multilingual data for low-resource languages. Our results provide both a foundation for Yiddish NLP and a practical template for language model development in historically rich but digitally underrepresented languages.
深度解读 · 五问五答
-
Q1: 这篇论文试图解决什么问题?
论文试图解决意第绪语(Yiddish)因数字文本稀缺和可靠评估资源匮乏而导致语言建模进展受限的问题。现有多语料库和基准常含大量噪声、机器翻译及误分类文本,不能真实反映该语言。作者旨在为这一历史丰富但数字欠代表语言提供高质量预训练语料与评测基准及专用模型。
-
Q2: 有哪些相关研究?
论文正文未具体列举已有研究文献或系统综述相关工作的名称与作者。仅指出已有多语言语料库和基准对意第绪语是较差的替代方案,包含噪声、机翻和错标文本。同时提及通用多语言模型在低资源语言上因噪声网络数据存在失败模式,但未引用具体前期研究。
-
Q3: 论文如何解决这个问题?
作者构建了Oytser高质量意第绪语预训练语料,融合当代网络原生源与文学材料。同时提出Kashes多任务基准,涵盖翻译、语言分析、信息抽取与语言理解。基于上述资源,他们对Llama 3.1 8B继续预训练得到MameLoshnLM,即首个开源8B意第绪语专用模型。
-
Q4: 论文做了哪些实验?
实验使用Kashes基准,其任务包括翻译、语言学分析、信息抽取和语言理解四类。基线为同规模开放通用多语言模型(open baselines of similar scale,如通用Llama类模型)。指标为各任务上的性能表现及词汇/形态模式捕捉分析;结果显示MameLoshnLM在基准各项任务优于基线,且更好捕获语言定义性词汇与形态模式。
-
Q5: 有什么可以进一步探索的点?
可探索将Oytser语料构建流程自动化并适配其他低资源语言,以验证模板泛化性。可研究继续预训练中的灾难性遗忘控制,平衡意第绪语专精与多语能力。还可扩展Kashes至口语化或方言变体评测,揭示形态丰富语言的细粒度模型弱点。
2026-08-04
2 篇
迈向多模态预训练的物理:知识流、模态协同、早期统一与配方
HF 热门
高相关
多模态预训练架构设计MoE
Towards Physics of Multimodal Pretraining: Knowledge Flow, Modality Synergy, Early Unification, and Recipes
判定:系统研究多模态统一预训练机制与配方
本文研究原生统一多模态预训练中模态交互机制与设计空间这一未被充分探索的问题。通过在合成与真实数据集上的受控实验,系统分析了知识跨模态流动、协同与竞争、早期统一训练优势及高效配方。结果发现共享注意力等架构促进协同,早期统一优于晚期对齐,并以5%算力获得强生成性能,最终训练13.5B MoE模型于2T tokens验证。
- 揭示语言与视觉间知识流的不对称转移模式
- 共享注意力与模态特定FFN架构促进模态协同
- 早期统一训练优于顺序训练并缓解视觉惰性
📄 2608.05000
▲ 52
💬 2
📅 2026-08-04
✍ Junlin Han 等 7 人
Vision offers a critical axis for advancing foundation models, driving a shift towards natively unified multimodal pretraining. Despite this momentum, the design space and the fundamental mechanisms of how modalities interact during unified training remain underexplored. We provide empirical clarity through a systematic exploration of multimodal pretraining. Our controlled experiments on both synthetic and large-scale real-world datasets yield four key insights into the physics of multimodal pretraining: (i) Knowledge Flow: We disentangle how language, visual understanding, and visual generation transfer knowledge across modalities, revealing distinct patterns of influence and asymmetry; (ii) Synergy vs. Competition: We show that data "complexity" largely determines whether modalities are synergistic, identify architectural choices that promote synergy: such as shared attention and normalization with modality-specific feed-forward layers, and find that these behaviors generalize across different visual tokenizer designs; (iii) Early Unification: Unifying modalities from the very early stages and training them jointly is shown to be more effective than late alignment or sequential training. This process uncovers a vision laziness phenomenon, where delayed integration leads models to rely on language priors; (iv) Recipes: We derive efficient pretraining recipes that achieve strong generative performance using only 5% of the compute budget. These core findings are subsequently validated at scale by training multiple 13.5B MoE models on 2T tokens. We hope this study provides a principled foundation for understanding and scaling multimodal pretraining.
深度解读 · 五问五答
-
Q1: 这篇论文试图解决什么问题?
论文试图解决多模态预训练在设计空间和模态交互基本机制上未被充分探索的问题。尽管原生统一多模态预训练成为趋势,但模态如何在统一训练中相互作用仍不清楚。作者旨在通过系统性实证探索,揭示多模态预训练的'物理规律'并为扩展提供原则性基础。
-
Q2: 有哪些相关研究?
论文正文节选中未提及任何具体的相关研究工作或文献引用。仅从摘要可知其背景是视觉推进基础模型、原生统一多模态预训练成为趋势。未提供对比方法、前作或同期工作的具体名称与结论。
-
Q3: 论文如何解决这个问题?
作者通过在合成与大规模真实数据集上的受控实验,系统探索多模态预训练并得出四项核心洞察。具体包括解耦知识跨模态流动、分析数据复杂度对协同/竞争的决定作用、验证早期统一训练优于晚期对齐、推导低算力预算训练配方。最终在13.5B MoE模型、2T token规模上验证发现。
-
Q4: 论文做了哪些实验?
实验设置:在合成数据集和大规模真实世界数据集上进行受控实验,探究知识流、模态协同与竞争、早期统一及训练配方。架构变量包括共享注意力与归一化+模态特定前馈层,并测试不同视觉tokenizer设计。规模验证:训练多个13.5B MoE模型,使用2T tokens。指标:知识跨模态转移模式与不对称、协同/竞争行为、生成性能(以仅用5%计算预算达到强生成性能为recipe指标),但未在节选中给出具体数值表。
-
Q5: 有什么可以进一步探索的点?
可深入探究'视觉懒惰'现象的内在优化动力学机制及延迟集成的临界窗口。不同视觉tokenizer虽行为可泛化,但其离散/连续表征对模态协同的细粒度影响值得系统消融。早期统一架构中模态特定FFN与共享注意力的计算分配比例,或可作为自适应路由进一步研究以提升13.5B MoE之外的效率。
K-EXAONE 2.0 技术报告
HF 热门
高相关
MoE持续预训练长上下文
K-EXAONE 2.0 Technical Report
判定:报告涵盖持续预训练与mid-training及MoE架构升级
LG AI Research发布开放权重的多语言MoE基座模型K-EXAONE 2.0,通过对前代模型向上循环并扩展架构实现750B总参数、37B激活参数。训练流程结合持续预训练、难度聚焦的mid-training与后训练,支持256K上下文及十种语言。该模型在智能体编程与长上下文理解上提升明显,已Apache 2.0开源。
- 由稠密模型向上循环为750B总参数MoE,激活37B
- 训练含持续预训练与难度聚焦mid-training
- 支持256K上下文并扩展至十种语言覆盖
📄 2608.04505
▲ 16
💬 1
📅 2026-08-04
✍ Eunbi Choi 等 77 人
This technical report presents K-EXAONE 2.0, an open-weight multilingual foundation model developed by LG AI Research as a step in our effort toward global frontier-scale foundation models. Rather than training from scratch, we upcycle K-EXAONE and expand its architecture, yielding a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model with 750B total parameters and approximately 37B activated per token---more than three times the capacity of its predecessor. K-EXAONE 2.0 supports context lengths of up to 256K tokens and expands multilingual coverage from six to ten languages. Its training pipeline combines continual pre-training, difficulty-focused mid-training, and post-training to strengthen reasoning, agentic coding, multilingual capability, and safety grounded in Korean sociocultural contexts. Across nine evaluation categories selected to reflect the conditions of practical use, K-EXAONE 2.0 improves over K-EXAONE and remains competitive with open-weight models, showing its largest gains in agentic coding and long-context understanding and its clearest strengths in long-context retrieval and safety. Released under the Apache 2.0 license, K-EXAONE 2.0 enables the wider AI ecosystem to evaluate, deploy, adapt, and build upon it, while marking the beginning---rather than the endpoint---of our challenge toward the global frontier.
深度解读 · 五问五答
-
Q1: 这篇论文试图解决什么问题?
论文试图推进LG AI Research面向全球前沿规模基础模型的努力,发布开放权重的多语言基础模型K-EXAONE 2.0。其目标是提升模型容量、多语言覆盖与长上下文能力,并强化推理、智能体编程、多语言性及基于韩国社会文化语境的安全性。该工作并非从零训练,而是通过升级复用K-EXAONE来更高效地扩展能力。
-
Q2: 有哪些相关研究?
论文正文仅明确提及前代模型K-EXAONE为其基础与对比对象,未列举其他外部学术研究或具体基线模型名称。相关工作中可确认的是K-EXAONE被作为被升级复用的 predecessor(前代模型)。此外,摘要中提到与开放权重模型(open-weight models)进行竞争力比较,但未给出具体模型列表。
-
Q3: 论文如何解决这个问题?
论文采用upcycle(升级复用)K-EXAONE并扩展架构的方式,构建总参数750B、每token激活约37B的MoE模型,容量超前代三倍。模型支持256K上下文,多语言覆盖由6种扩至10种。训练流程结合持续预训练、难度聚焦的中训练与后训练,以强化推理、智能体编程、多语言能力与韩国语境安全。
-
Q4: 论文做了哪些实验?
论文在九个反映实际使用的评估类别上对K-EXAONE 2.0进行评估,具体数据集与任务名未在正文中列出。基线包括前代K-EXAONE及若干未具名的开放权重模型。指标显示相较K-EXAONE全面提升,在智能体编程与长上下文理解增益最大,在长上下文检索与安全性上优势最明显,且整体与开放权重模型具竞争力。
-
Q5: 有什么可以进一步探索的点?
可探索将升级复用(upcycle)策略系统性对比从零训练,在MoE扩展中的参数效率与退化风险。长上下文256K的推理成本与检索鲁棒性在真实多语言混合场景下的边界值得细测。基于韩国社会文化的安全对齐如何迁移到其它语种或跨文化冲突情境,是具技术洞见的开放问题。
2026-08-03
2 篇
LLaDA MoE v2:扩展混合专家扩散语言模型
HF 热门
高相关
MoEScaling Law架构设计
LLaDA MoE v2: Scaling Mixture-of-Experts Diffusion Language Models
判定:系统研究MoE扩散语言模型预训练缩放规律并从零训练基座
本文研究混合专家扩散语言模型(MoE dLLM)的缩放行为,系统刻画其优化超参、算力分配与架构随规模的变化规律,发现与自回归模型存在定量差异。基于上述发现,从零训练了30B-A3B的LLaDA MoE v2基座模型,使用23.5T tokens预训练。该模型在仅经监督微调后,于多项推理与代码基准上接近或超越Qwen3等强基线,确立了MoE dLLM的实用缩放律与设计原则。
- 揭示MoE扩散语言模型最优批大小、学习率与AR模型不同的缩放规律
- IsoFLOP分析显示MoE dLLM最优token预算增长快于激活算力
- 从零训练30B-A3B dLLM,少token量下逼近Qwen3并超越SDAR Chat
📄 2608.03457
▲ 28
💬 2
📅 2026-08-03
✍ Fengqi Zhu 等 14 人
Diffusion language models (dLLMs) offer an alternative to autoregressive (AR) language modeling, yet the scaling behavior of Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) dLLMs remains poorly understood. We systematically characterize how optimization hyperparameters, compute allocation, and architecture scale for MoE dLLMs, identifying quantitative differences from scaling trends previously reported for AR models. Specifically, for optimization, the optimal nominal batch size grows faster, while the optimal learning rate decays more rapidly with compute. For model--data allocation, IsoFLOP analysis reveals a slight data-side tilt: the optimal token budget grows faster than activated model-side computation. For MoE architecture, larger scales increasingly favor larger expert pools at fixed activated capacity, while moderate expert granularity remains consistently effective and the preferred fraction of activated capacity assigned to shared experts remains stable across scales. Guided by these findings, we train LLaDA MoE v2, a 30B-A3B dLLM, from scratch on 23.5T tokens. With approximately 65\% as many pretraining tokens as Qwen3, LLaDA MoE v2 approaches Qwen3 on several knowledge, reasoning, and coding benchmarks. After supervised fine-tuning alone, it outperforms SDAR Chat on seven of eight reasoning and coding benchmarks and remains close to Qwen3 on several tasks. These results establish practical scaling laws and design principles for MoE dLLMs.
深度解读 · 五问五答
-
Q1: 这篇论文试图解决什么问题?
论文试图解决扩散语言模型(dLLMs)中混合专家(MoE)架构的扩展规律不明的问题。此前AR模型的扩展趋势已被研究,但MoE dLLMs在优化超参、计算分配和架构缩放上的行为缺乏系统刻画。论文旨在建立MoE dLLMs实用的扩展法则与设计原则。
-
Q2: 有哪些相关研究?
论文提及了自回归(AR)语言模型的已有扩展趋势研究作为对比基线。提到了Qwen3作为同规模AR模型基线用于后续评测。提到了SDAR Chat作为监督微调后对比的对话/推理模型。未在正文中列举更具体的文献。
-
Q3: 论文如何解决这个问题?
论文系统刻画了MoE dLLMs在优化、模型-数据分配和MoE架构三方面的扩展规律:最优批大小随计算增长更快、学习率衰减更快;IsoFLOP显示数据侧微倾斜;更大规模偏好更大专家池且共享专家比例稳定。基于规律从零训练30B-A3B的LLaDA MoE v2于23.5T tokens,并做监督微调验证。
-
Q4: 论文做了哪些实验?
训练实验:从零训练LLaDA MoE v2(30B参数、3B激活)于23.5T tokens,预训练token数约为Qwen3的65%。评测基准:知识、推理、编码类基准(未列具体名),对比基线Qwen3与SDAR Chat。指标:预训练后接近Qwen3;SFT后于8个推理与编码基准中7个超越SDAR Chat,其余接近Qwen3。扩展分析实验:IsoFLOP分析、不同专家池大小与粒度的架构扫描。
-
Q5: 有什么可以进一步探索的点?
可探索MoE dLLMs在超大规模(如100B+激活)下专家池与共享容量的非线性交互是否仍稳定。可研究扩散去噪步数与MoE路由稀疏性的联合优化以降低推理成本。可验证所得扩展法则在 multilingual 或多模态扩散语言模型上的泛化性。
当注意力失明:ALiBi位置编码中的数值失效问题
HF 热门
中相关
位置编码架构设计长上下文
When Attention Goes Blind: Numerical Failure in ALiBi Positional Encodings
判定:分析ALiBi位置编码缺陷及训练时缓解策略
本文揭示了ALiBi位置编码因线性偏置缩放下溢浮点精度,导致部分注意力头失明的失效模式。通过148M解码器预训练实验分析其影响,并评估四种训练时缓解策略。结果表明log缩放距离在passkey检索上最稳定,且默认ALiBi斜率仍是强基线,并给出训练建议。
- ALiBi线性偏置下溢致注意力权重归零、头部部分失明
- 148M解码器预训练实验区分该失效与上下文外退化
- log缩放距离等训练时策略可缓解,默认ALiBi仍具竞争力
📄 2608.03994
▲ 5
💬 2
📅 2026-08-03
✍ Christopher Schröder 等 5 人
We identify a previously overlooked failure mode of ALiBi positional encoding: its linear bias scaling underflows floating-point precision, which zeroes out a large fraction of attention weights and renders the affected attention heads partially blind. We analyze this failure mode, characterize its impact, and examine four mitigation strategies. We further demonstrate its occurrence in state-of-the-art pretrained models based on ALiBi. Comprehensive pretraining experiments with 148M-parameter decoder models help us to disentangle its effects from out-of-context degradation. We find that ALiBi's failure mode can substantially impair token retrieval while having only a minor effect on standard decoder benchmarks. We propose four training-time mitigation strategies and evaluate them individually and in combinations, finding that log-scaled distances yield the most consistent improvements in passkey retrieval. Despite this problem, default ALiBi slopes remain a surprisingly strong baseline, particularly for needle-in-a-haystack retrieval. Based on these findings we provide concrete recommendations on how to train models with ALiBi.
深度解读 · 五问五答
-
Q1: 这篇论文试图解决什么问题?
论文识别了ALiBi位置编码中一个此前被忽视的失败模式:其线性偏置缩放会下溢浮点精度,导致大量注意力权重归零。这会使受影响的注意力头部分失明,损害模型能力。论文旨在分析该故障模式、刻画其影响并提出缓解策略。
-
Q2: 有哪些相关研究?
论文正文未提及具体的相关研究工作或文献。仅说明该ALiBi数值失败模式是先前被忽视的(previously overlooked)。同时指出在基于ALiBi的先进预训练模型中已观察到该现象发生。
-
Q3: 论文如何解决这个问题?
论文提出了四种训练时缓解策略,并分别及组合评估了它们。其中发现对数缩放距离(log-scaled distances)在passkey检索中带来最一致的改进。基于发现,论文给出了如何训练带ALiBi模型的具体建议,并指出默认ALiBi斜率仍是强基线。
-
Q4: 论文做了哪些实验?
实验包括:在基于ALiBi的SOTA预训练模型中验证失败模式发生;用148M参数解码器模型做全面预训练实验,以分离该效应与上下文外退化(out-of-context degradation)。指标涵盖token检索(如passkey/needle-in-a-haystack检索)和标准解码器基准(standard decoder benchmarks),发现故障严重损害检索而仅轻微影响基准。还评估了四种缓解策略单独与组合的效果。
-
Q5: 有什么可以进一步探索的点?
可探索不同数值精度(如bf16/fp32)下ALiBi下溢阈值的系统性刻画及硬件层面影响。可研究该失明现象在更大规模模型或编码器架构中的泛化性。还可设计自适应斜率或混合精度注意力计算以从根本上避免偏置下溢,而非仅用对数缩放缓解。
2026-07-29
3 篇
规模化记忆解码器:一种预训练的参数化长期记忆
HF 热门
高相关
预训练目标与算法训练系统模型架构
Memory Decoder at Scale: A Pretrained, Parametric Long-Term Memory
判定:从零预训练参数化长期记忆模块并规模化
针对解码器模型记忆与推理纠缠、难以独立扩展记忆容量的问题,本文提出规模化记忆解码器,将记忆模型扩展至6.9B参数并在300B token上预训练。为解决Faiss索引检索瓶颈,设计了分布式索引检索与稀疏批式kNN加载管线。实验表明独立扩展预训练记忆比单纯扩大基座更高效,6.9B记忆配Pythia-410M超越Pythia-12B且参数量少39%,Qwen3配域记忆平均提升超9分。
- 提出规模化参数化长期记忆模块并从零预训练
- 设计分布式Faiss索引与稀疏批式kNN加载解决吞吐瓶颈
- 独立扩展预训练记忆比扩大基座模型更具参数效率
📄 2607.27919
▲ 51
💬 2
📅 2026-07-29
✍ Rubin Wei 等 7 人
Decoder-only language models entangle long-term memory and reasoning in a single parameter set, making it difficult to scale memory capacity independently. Memory Decoder introduces a parametric long-term memory module but only studies it at a relatively small scale. In this work, we present Memory Decoder at Scale, scaling memory models up to 6.9B parameters and pretraining them on 300B tokens. At this data scale, the combined cost of indexing and search makes a standard Faiss pipeline infeasible. We address this bottleneck with a distributed pipeline for Faiss indexing and retrieval, together with sparse, batch-wise loading of kNN distributions. Across model scales, we find that allocating more parameters to memory yields a better parameter-performance tradeoff than scaling the base model alone. On 17 benchmarks, pairing a 6.9B general memory with Pythia-410M raises its average score from 29.86 to 37.34, surpassing Pythia-12B (37.24) with 39% fewer total parameters. For Qwen3 Base models ranging from 0.6B to 14B, 1.7B domain memories improve the average score across the three domains by more than 9 points at every scale. Overall, our results demonstrate that independently scaling pretrained memory offers a more parameter efficient path to improving language model performance.
深度解读 · 五问五答
-
Q1: 这篇论文试图解决什么问题?
标准 decoder-only 语言模型将长期记忆与推理纠缠在单一参数集中,无法独立扩展记忆容量,且领域适配需全参数优化并易灾难性遗忘。Memory Decoder 虽提出参数化长期记忆模块,但仅在较小规模(≤1B 参数、百万级 token)验证。本文旨在将参数化记忆预训练扩展到 6.9B 参数和 300B token 规模,并解决大规模 kNN 分布构建与存储不可行的问题,探索记忆与基座参数分配权衡。
-
Q2: 有哪些相关研究?
短期记忆相关:segment-level recurrence、bounded KV caches、distant context retrieval、RoPE rescaling,均不改长期记忆与推理纠缠。长期记忆相关:RAG 与 kNN-LM 需外部检索;Titans 用神经长期记忆编码测试时历史上下文;Memory Decoder 与 MLP Memory 预训练参数化记忆模仿 kNN 检索分布,后者仅小规验证。
-
Q3: 论文如何解决这个问题?
构建分布式 Faiss 流水线:OPQ256 将 4096 维键压至 256 维,IVF+HNSW 分片 IndexIVFPQ 并行 GPU 搜索,避免标准流水线在 207B 条目下索引与搜索瓶颈。通用记忆采用稀疏 kNN 分布存储(按阈值保留平均 64.95 个 token-概率对,约 250× 压缩)与分布式内存映射流式加载。领域记忆沿用同架构与稀疏流水线,在生物/法律/金融语料最多 4.4B token 上训练,并支持跨词表迁移仅用 20% 预算。
-
Q4: 论文做了哪些实验?
实验设置:256×A800-80G,Megatron-LM;通用记忆用去重 Pile(207B) 训 1.4/2.8/6.9B 记忆 300B token,基座 Pythia 410M–12B 冻结;领域记忆用 Qwen3-Base 0.6–14B,生物/法律/金融语料训 1.7B 记忆;跨词表用 OLMo-2/3-7B。数据集:通用 17 基准(ARC、LAMBADA、MMLU、NQ、TriviaQA 等);领域 BioInst、LawBench、FinEval。基线:通用比 Pythia 同参;领域比 CPT、LoRA、RAG(Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B top5)。指标:各基准标准准确率/EM,通用 AVG 百分比,领域均值;α 在验证集调优。结果:Pythia-410M+Mem-6.9B 达 37.34 超 Pythia-12B(37.24) 省 39% 参;领域记忆各尺度平均提升 >9 点。
-
Q5: 有什么可以进一步探索的点?
可探索更高效的跨词表迁移机制,如仅训嵌入与 LM head 外是否可复用更多层以减少 20% 预算下的性能损失。可研究检索温度 τ 与 KL 权重 β、插值 α 在不同领域/尺度下的自动联合优化。可考察记忆模块在指令微调或推理时计算分配(如早退、稀疏激活)以进一步降推理成本。
Chimera:设计与Chinchilla式缩放的混合视觉扩散Transformer
HF 热门
中相关
架构设计Scaling LawMoE
Chimera: Designing and Chinchilla-Scaling Hybrid Visual Diffusion Transformers
判定:视觉扩散Transformer的架构与Scaling Law预训练方法
针对高分辨率图像与长视频生成中全注意力二次复杂度问题,提出Chimera混合视觉扩散骨干,融合KDA、MLA与MoE并设计HeteroP超参迁移方案。基于Chinchilla式计算最优律拟合激活参量、训练token与图文视频配比,训练11B总参/2B激活模型。实验表明其预训练扩散损失计算效率达基线7.3倍,且可零样本外推至30秒视频。
- 提出KDA+MLA+MoE混合架构消除位置编码并实现线性复杂度长上下文
- HeteroP模块级超参迁移支撑异构架构的Chinchilla式计算最优缩放
- 实测预训练扩散损失效率7.3倍且零样本视频时长外推至30秒
📄 2607.28611
▲ 17
💬 1
📅 2026-07-29
✍ Chongjian Ge 等 12 人
Visual generation increasingly requires high-resolution images, long videos, and multimodal context, making the quadratic cost of full attention prohibitive. We introduce Chimera, a hybrid visual diffusion backbone with a principled scaling recipe. Chimera processes text, image, and video tokens in one raster-ordered stream without positional embeddings. It combines Kimi Delta Attention (KDA) for long-context state tracking with O(N) complexity, interleaved Multi-head Latent Attention (MLA) for direct global interaction, and modality-aware short convolutions for local spatiotemporal context. Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) layers expand capacity while controlling activated compute. To scale this heterogeneous architecture, we introduce HeteroP, a module-wise scheme that transfers hyperparameters across width and depth according to each tensor's functional fan-in and model depth. HeteroP yields a consistently tuned family used to fit Chinchilla-style compute-optimal laws for activated model size, training-token count, and image-video data ratio. Guided by these laws, we train an 11B-parameter Chimera with 2B activated parameters. Experiments show three results. First, measured by pretraining diffusion loss, the dense backbone is 1.7x as compute-efficient as a matched full-attention Wan-2.1 2B baseline, while the complete system reaches 7.3x. Second, without length-specific fine-tuning, Chimera extrapolates zero-shot from 5-second training clips to 30-second videos, with only 6.5% FID degradation in the last five seconds. Third, the fitted laws show that compute-optimal image pretraining divides compute nearly evenly between activated model size and training-token count, whereas video pretraining modestly favors model size at higher budgets. These results establish a foundation for designing and scaling efficient long-context diffusion architectures.
深度解读 · 五问五答
-
Q1: 这篇论文试图解决什么问题?
论文试图解决视觉生成进入token密集 regime 时,Diffusion Transformer 全注意力二次计算成本过高的问题。同时,视觉生成缺乏系统性的架构缩放框架,无法像语言模型那样通过超参转移和算力最优定律指导模型规模、token预算与数据组成。语言模型的架构与缩放方案因需保持时空局部性和双向跨模态交互而不能直接迁移。因此核心矛盾是设计适配视觉数据结构的高效上下文建模架构,并开发配套缩放框架。
-
Q2: 有哪些相关研究?
语言模型方面:稀疏注意力、压缩KV表示、线性序列算子、稀疏激活容量,以及超参转移和Chinchilla算力最优定律等。视觉扩散方面:Wan-2.1全注意力基线、FLUX.1-dev与Z-Image-Turbo图像生成器、DiT及交叉/双流设计、复杂扫描模式视觉建模等。架构组件参考:Kimi Delta Attention (KDA)、Multi-head Latent Attention (MLA)、MoE、identity hyper-connections、sandwich normalization、μP风格转移。视觉生成评测相关:GenEval、DPG-Bench、FID等下游指标。
-
Q3: 论文如何解决这个问题?
提出Chimera混合视觉扩散骨干:单流处理文本/图像/视频token,大多数层用KDA做O(N)线性复杂度状态跟踪,周期MLA层做全局交互,模态感知短卷积捕局部时空上下文,无位置嵌入。采用稀疏MoE扩容、iHC与sandwich norm稳训练。提出HeteroP按张量功能fan-in与深度推导模块级缩放比,实现跨宽深超参转移。基于受控模型族拟合Chinchilla式算力最优定律(含图像-视频数据比变量),指导训练11B总参/2B激活模型。
-
Q4: 论文做了哪些实验?
预训练扩散损失效率实验:以Wan-2.1(2B)全注意力为基线,密集骨干达1.7×效率、完整系统7.3×效率(同算力FLOPs对比)。零样本长度外推:训练5秒片段,直接生成30秒视频,末5秒FID仅退化6.5%(对比先验方法>50%),无长度微调。长序列效率:A100-80GB上KDA/MLA支持>1.68×长序列、255k token快2.14×,设定batch=1、BF16、512文本token、18×28视觉token/temporal slice。基准对比:GenEval与DPG-Bench上比FLUX.1-dev、Z-Image-Turbo,训练仅约600 H100 Days(Z-Image-Turbo约12.4K)。缩放定律:用训练曲线包络、IsoFLOP、参数损失面拟合,图像N_opt∝C^0.48–0.52、视频∝C^0.53–0.56。
-
Q5: 有什么可以进一步探索的点?
可探索将HeteroP推广至其他异构视觉架构(如含状态空间层或卷积变体)验证模块级缩放比通用性。视频预训练在高算力偏向模型容量的机理未明,可研究数据时空冗余与激活参量边际收益的关系。NoPE设计依赖时间主栅格扫描,可考察对非线性重排或3D局部性保持的鲁棒性。MoE路由与KDA状态交互可能影响长视频一致性,值得做专家专化与状态衰减的联合分析。
超越几何互补性:稀疏混合专家路由中的相干重叠
HF 热门
中相关
MoE架构设计
Beyond Geometric Complementarity: Coherent Overlap in Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Routing
判定:分析MoE路由几何特性,涉及预训练架构与训练
该论文研究稀疏MoE语言模型中专家路由的几何与功能关系,指出共选专家存在显著子空间重叠但路由仍具价值。作者提出ESSI指标与受控因子实验,分离路由相干性、候选质量与上下文交互。结果表明实际路由优于匹配替代,且多专家计算在冻结路由下仍提升下一词预测,定义为“相干重叠”。
- 区分路由相干性、候选质量与上下文交互三类量
- 跨六类MoE证实专家子空间重叠但实际路由更优
- 冻结路由下加专家仍改善预测,称相干重叠现象
📄 2607.28308
▲ 4
💬 2
📅 2026-07-29
✍ Huiyuan Tian 等 3 人
Sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) language models route each token to multiple experts, suggesting a geometric account of their benefit: co-selected experts should contribute distinct representation directions. Existing evidence often conflates route coherence, candidate quality, and candidate-by-context interaction. We distinguish these quantities using an Expert Subspace Separation Index (ESSI), matched-route residuals, and a prefix-controlled 2times2 factorial; frozen-route interventions and a controlled Top-k study assess functional value. Three paired contrasts organize the findings. First, across six MoE architectures, expert subspaces overlap substantially, yet actual routes explain token representations better than matched alternatives. Second, across the 39 factorial cells in OLMoE, Mixtral, and DeepSeek, the selected candidate explains more of the residual representation than the strongest unselected rival in every cell, yet the actual prefix narrows this advantage throughout: all interactions are negative, and every 95% confidence interval lies below zero. Third, this geometric narrowing does not imply functional redundancy: adding later experts improves next-token prediction in 24 of 39 frozen-route comparisons, while the other 15 estimates are inconclusive; a controlled training study also favors Top-2 over Top-1 in all three seeds. We call this joint pattern coherent overlap: routing selects token-relevant experts from a shared geometric neighborhood, while useful multi-expert computation persists without disjoint linear coverage. Separating these quantities clarifies why geometric similarity alone cannot determine redundancy or pruning value.
深度解读 · 五问五答
-
Q1: 这篇论文试图解决什么问题?
论文试图厘清稀疏MoE路由中'几何互补性'直觉背后的三个被混淆的量:路由一致性、候选质量、候选-上下文交互。现有工作常将路由效果好归因于专家占据不相交表示方向,但未能证明候选专家优势是否依赖其共选上下文。本文要分离这些量,判断多专家价值是否由 disjoint 线性覆盖解释,还是存在'连贯重叠'。
-
Q2: 有哪些相关研究?
相关研究包括MoE基础与稀疏路由设计(如Top-k、专家选择、哈希路由)、容量与粒度缩放分析。另有刻画预训练MoE多样性、共激活、路由器-专家几何耦合、表示崩溃的工作;以及知识归属、语义路由、路由反事实等线路。这些方法表征内部结构或路由质量,但未通过交叉候选与上下文来识别交互作用。
-
Q3: 论文如何解决这个问题?
提出ESSI指标,以局部专家内切向离散归一化专家间子空间距离,提供无自然基线的分离度校准。构建前缀控制的2×2因子设计,交叉实际/替代上下文与选中/最强未选候选,用差分中的差分D分离候选质量、上下文机会与交互。结合冻结路由干预与受控Top-1/Top-2训练研究,评估几何新颖性之外的功能价值。
-
Q4: 论文做了哪些实验?
几何调查:6个模型(OLMoE、Mixtral、DeepSeek-MoE、Qwen3、Gemma4、Qwen3.6)共18模型-层单元,指标为ESSI(范围0.776–1.060,中位0.969)与替代/实际残差比(>1,中位1.283)。因子分析:OLMoE/Mixtral 24单元+DeepSeek 15单元共39单元,每单元至多2048留痕令牌,指标为候选优势A_actual、上下文效应T_s/T_r、交互D(全负,95% CI低于0);用1000次配对bootstrap。功能实验:39单元冻结路由NLL干预(24/39显著降低),九配置leader vs 后专家替换;受控6层MoE三种子Top-1/Top-2训练,指标验证损失(Δ=0.1016±0.0025)。
-
Q5: 有什么可以进一步探索的点?
可探索非线性计算如何在共享几何邻域内产生不同输出方向,从而解释低线性新颖性伴生预测增益的机制,例如用表示相似性归因到专家MLP通路。可扩展因子设计到专家选择路由与哈希路由,检验连贯重叠是否跨路由范式稳健。还可研究训练目标(如多样性正则)如何显式调节ESSI与交互D,以指导剪枝而不误删功能重要后专家。
2026-07-28
3 篇
Metis:记忆基础模型
HF 热门
中相关
架构设计预训练数据mid-training
Metis: Memory Foundation Model
判定:涉及mid-training与训练数据构建,对预训练有借鉴
该论文旨在为基座模型赋予原生记忆能力,弥补外部记忆模块的不足。提出Metis架构,在主干中引入持久演化的记忆状态,并通过大规模记忆专用训练数据与多目标在mid-training阶段习得记忆过程。推理时权重冻结、记忆状态经前向自主更新,实验显示其具备原生记忆能力并开源了模型。
- 提出原生记忆状态与记忆过程的形式化定义
- 通过mid-training与专用数据习得记忆能力
- 推理时梯度无关仅前向更新记忆状态
📄 2607.26760
▲ 261
💬 3
📅 2026-07-28
✍ Zeyu Zhang 等 17 人
Recent advances in AI agents have increasingly internalized native capabilities into their underlying foundation models, giving rise to multimodal foundation models and large reasoning models. However, agent memory is still primarily implemented through external modules, leaving the native memory capability largely unexplored. In this paper, we take a first step toward this direction by introducing memory foundation models, which empower foundation models with native memory capabilities. We formalize native memory from two perspectives: a persistent and dynamically evolving memory state within the backbone, and native memory procedures that autonomously store and utilize information through model computation. We show that native memory offers advantages in architecture, end-to-end optimization, and efficiency. Based on this formulation, we propose Metis, the first prototype of memory foundation models. Metis introduces a new architecture that equips a foundation model with a native memory state, allowing historical information to be compressed into the model and accessed through memory attention. We construct large-scale memory-specific training data and introduce multiple optimization objectives to acquire these native memory procedures through mid-training. The online memory maintenance of Metis is gradient-free, and the memory update requires only a forward pass. At inference time, all learned model weights remain frozen, while the native memory states are autonomously transformed through standard forward computation. Through extensive experiments, we show that Metis exhibits native memory capabilities and further provide a detailed analysis of its strengths, limitations, and behaviors. To facilitate future research on memory foundation models, we release our project and model checkpoints.
深度解读 · 五问五答
-
Q1: 这篇论文试图解决什么问题?
论文指出现有AI agent的记忆主要依赖外部模块(如RAG),导致架构解耦、端到端优化困难、在线推理延迟增加等问题。其目标是将记忆能力原生内化到基础模型内部,提出“记忆基础模型”概念,赋予模型原生记忆状态与记忆过程。具体以Metis为首个原型,探索用动态参数表示记忆并通过前向计算自主更新,消除对外部文本记忆的依赖。
-
Q2: 有哪些相关研究?
论文对比了测试时训练(TTT)、记忆增强神经网络(MANNs)、In-place TTT、MemGen、δ-Mem、MEMO、MemFT、Memory 3等。TTT在单序列内适应且缺乏显式记忆过程;MANNs使用外部可微记忆槽与控制器;后几类仍依赖上下文文本记忆或离线文档。Memory 3将离线知识编码为可检索显式记忆,而本文进一步走向在线交互的原生参数化记忆。
-
Q3: 论文如何解决这个问题?
论文形式化定义记忆基础模型,明确原生记忆状态(骨干内动态参数)与原生记忆过程(随前向计算自主存储/遗忘/更新)。提出Metis架构,基于Fast Weight Programming引入Metis块(超记忆块+局部记忆块)并通过记忆注意力整合状态。构建大规模记忆专用合成数据,以记忆重建、记忆操作与正则化目标进行mid-training;推理时权重冻结,记忆状态仅靠前向传播无梯度更新。
-
Q4: 论文做了哪些实验?
正文仅说明“通过广泛实验展示Metis的原生记忆能力,并提供优势、局限与行为的详细分析”,未列出具体数据集名称、基线模型或量化指标。实验设置细节应在正文第6节(未提供节选),已知其使用公开数据集合成记忆专用数据,基线隐含为外部记忆(如RAG)及传统无记忆基础模型,评估应涵盖记忆任务表现与效率。局限性实验显示长期任务性能下降与语义混淆现象。
-
Q5: 有什么可以进一步探索的点?
可探索固定尺寸参数压缩导致长期信息损失的问题,如设计可扩展或分层原生记忆状态以提升长程记忆容量。可研究潜空间语义混合引起的信息混淆,通过解耦记忆槽或对比对齐损失改善记忆区分度。此外,将原生记忆与多模态、终身学习结合,并探索跨域θ1初始化与指令驱动记忆过程的泛化边界,是具技术洞见的方向。
探索式建模:解锁第三预训练轴与端到端生成
HF 热门
高相关
预训练目标与算法训练动力学Scaling Law
Explorative Modeling: Unlocking a Third Pretraining Axis and End-to-End Generation
判定:提出探索建模作为生成模型第三预训练轴并端到端训练
该工作指出生成模型尚未端到端训练,因多模态分布难以直接建模。提出Explorative Modeling(XM),通过分解训练循环、探索K个候选匹配并选最优训练,使预测提交到具体模式。XM在图像、视频、语言上随探索规模提升性能,提升FLOP效率4.1倍等,并支持端到端重建生成,推理步数大幅减少。
- 提出Explorative Modeling新范式,分解训练循环而非生成过程
- 探索规模成为参数与数据外的第三预训练轴,随规模增益增大
- XM支持端到端生成建模,在多项任务显著提升效率与性能
📄 2607.27372
▲ 13
💬 2
📅 2026-07-28
✍ Alexi Gladstone 等 3 人
The deep learning revolution, kicked off by AlexNet, taught us that end-to-end training beats decomposing a problem into hand-designed stages. Generative modeling, however, has remained the exception-despite generative models being remarkably capable, they are still not trained end-to-end. This is because, at its core, generative modeling is about handling distributions with many modes, and existing scalable approaches handle this the same way, by factoring the generation procedure, which prevents end-to-end generation. In this work, we introduce Explorative Modeling, a new paradigm that instead factors the training loop, exploring K candidate matches between model generations and data, and training on the best, so predictions commit to modes rather than blurring them. We find Explorative Models (XMs) useful in two settings. First, increasing exploration adds a third pretraining axis beyond parameters and data for existing generative models-where scaling exploration monotonically improves performance across both continuous and discrete domains (images, video, and language). Notably, gains from exploration increase with scale, climbing from 7% to 36% as data scales and from 13% to 23% as models grow, with efficiency gains more than doubling at 3x the compute. Concretely, exploration improves FLOP efficiency by 4.1x, sample efficiency by 6.2x, parameter efficiency by 47%, lifts the strongest of image-generation recipes to a near-state-of-the-art 1.43 FID on ImageNet without guidance, enables scaling how end-to-end existing models are, and unlocks scaling generalization. Second, XMs enable end-to-end reconstructive generative modeling, matching diffusion on control tasks with 16-256x fewer inference steps. Together, these results establish XMs as both a new pretraining axis for existing generative models and a standalone end-to-end generative modeling paradigm.
深度解读 · 五问五答
-
Q1: 这篇论文试图解决什么问题?
论文试图解决现有可扩展重构生成模型(如自回归、扩散、流模型)因将生成过程分解为多步训练而非端到端训练,导致推理与训练采样不一致、暴露偏差和误差累积的问题。其核心难点在于生成建模需处理多峰分布,现有方法通过分解生成步骤避免模式模糊,但这阻碍了端到端生成。论文旨在提出一种新范式,在保持捕获多峰分布能力的同时实现端到端生成,并解锁超越参数与数据的第三预训练轴(生成表达力)。
-
Q2: 有哪些相关研究?
相关研究包括:对比生成模型(GAN、对比散度EBM)虽端到端但难以扩展;重构生成模型(自回归、扩散、流、单步模型)通过分解生成步骤实现规模化的模式强制(Mode Forcing);Jumpy生成模型通过跳跃数在端到端与表达力间权衡;VAE用编码器推断潜变量但易后验崩溃难扩展;最优传输(OT)耦合方法因立方复杂度或minibatch偏差难扩展;best-of-K思想在先前工作多次出现;分类器无关引导与自引导揭示现有模型存在模式模糊。Mode Forcing理论指出规模化生成即设计避免平均化的重构目标。
-
Q3: 论文如何解决这个问题?
论文提出探索建模(Explorative Modeling, XM),不改生成过程而分解训练循环:每步训练模型生成K个候选样本,仅对最接近数据的那个计算重构损失并回传梯度(即best-of-K,公式ℒ=min_i J(ŷ_i,x))。这通过搜索潜变量-数据配对使单预测提交到特定模式而非平均,将生成表达力从1提升至至少K,消除模糊。XM可作为独立端到端重构模型(Forward/Reverse XM),也可叠加于现有扩散、流、Jumpy模型上作为新缩放轴,替代生成分解。
-
Q4: 论文做了哪些实验?
实验基于扩散/Flow Matching与Jumpy生成模型家族,在连续与离散域验证:图像生成用ImageNet,指标为FID(无引导达1.43近SOTA);视频与语言(含MDLM掩码扩散语言建模)展示探索提升表达力;2D混合分布可视化模式捕获。控制任务基线为Diffusion Policy(行为克隆)与Diffuser(目标条件世界模型),XM以少16–256倍推理步匹配。缩放实验测FLOP效率(4.1×)、样本效率(6.2×)、参数效率(47%),及随数据规模增益7%→36%、模型规模13%→23%,并验证探索增广泛化与端到端程度。
-
Q5: 有什么可以进一步探索的点?
论文指出当前XM以随机搜索潜变量-数据配对,可改为基于梯度的搜索以降训练计算成本并提效率(第6节)。可研究探索与生成分解的最优替代曲线,在更大规模下量化端到端极限与泛化收益。XM耦合避免minibatch OT偏差但仅用自身样本,可探全局耦合近似与课程式K增长。另可延伸至对比模型扩展瓶颈,或将隐式能量最小化搜索与学习更系统结合以解锁更强第三轴缩放。
宪法式中间训练:内容呈现驱动对齐增益
HF 热门
中相关
continual/mid-training预训练数据课程学习
Constitutional Midtraining: Content Presence Drives Alignment Gains
判定:涉及mid-training阶段插入内容,属预训练延续
该研究探讨在中间训练(midtraining)阶段插入基于原则的价值观内容能否产生持久对齐。方法是在120B规模上以宪法语料进行中间训练,采用2x2因子设计对比重放控制组。结果显示宪法式中间训练提升对齐泛化与耐久性,且在黑mail等场景优势可存活良性微调,且不损能力。
- 在midtraining隔离插入宪法内容验证持久对齐
- 120B规模2x2实验显示内容存在比结构更重要
- 宪法中间训练抗黑mail倾向且不影响基准能力
📄 2607.26654
▲ 6
💬 2
📅 2026-07-28
✍ Desiree Cho 等 7 人
Post-training alignment is often shallow, eroding under fine-tuning. Whether midtraining interventions, cleanly isolated from post-training, can produce durable alignment remains untested. We test this via constitutional midtraining: inserting principled, values-based content into midtraining against a replay-only control at 120B scale. Our 394M-token constitutional corpus, built from Anthropic's Constitution, uses a 2x2 factorial design (curriculum ordering x deliberative reasoning) to produce four constitutionally midtrained conditions plus a control, evaluated on self-generated and established benchmarks including alignment under pressure, value conflict resolution, blackmail, and emergent misalignment across three stages: post-midtraining, post-SFT, and post-benign fine-tuning. Constitutionally midtrained models outperform the control on alignment generalization and durability, notably on blackmail: SFT instills a blackmail propensity in all models, but constitutional midtraining blunts it, with the advantage surviving benign fine-tuning (-17.5pp). This durability does not extend to settings requiring active resistance to in-context pressure or conflict, where the advantage attenuates after SFT. The presence of constitutional content at midtraining also matters more than its structure, and constitutional midtraining incurs no cost, on average, on the capabilities we test (MMLU, ARC-Easy, piqa, GSM8K) at any stage. A modest amount of constitutional content at midtraining could therefore yield broad, persistent alignment gains, offering a cheap, complementary addition to SFT-centered pipelines. Code, data, and models are available.
深度解读 · 五问五答
-
Q1: 这篇论文试图解决什么问题?
论文指出主流后训练对齐(SFT/RLHF/DPO/CAI)浅且脆,易在良性微调下侵蚀,而预训练已内化的不安全模式难以后期移除。其核心研究问题是:孤立的宪法中期训练(CMT)能否产生可泛化且持久(非浅层)的对齐,而非仅在训练分布内有效。探索性子问题是:课程排序(基础到外围)与显式价值推理(DR)是否能进一步调制该效应。此前更大规模、干净隔离于后训练的宪法中期训练及其持久性尚无人验证。
-
Q2: 有哪些相关研究?
预训练对齐干预:27发现过滤有害内容反致失败,合成插入更安全;41在末阶段插合成对齐数据以1/10数据获全量收益且不降能力。宪法方法:4提Constitutional AI;3在后期训练用宪法文档+叙事将代理性错位降3倍;22做model spec midtraining(32B、值孤立、叠微调)。中期训练:19在前沿尺度做对齐中期训练但增益未持久;28指中期训练压缩表征或为机制。课程与推理:5形式化课程学习;27、22、3均发现显式推理提升泛化优于仅示范。
-
Q3: 论文如何解决这个问题?
从Anthropic 2026宪法手抽40值,用SBERT算中心性并聚为4簇(k1→k4基础到外围),做2×2设计:课程序vs均匀混 × 带推理DR vs无推理noDR,加对照组,基于Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-Base做120B规模中期训练。中期训练后将各条件接相同价值中性SFT与GSM8K的GRPO良性微调,干净隔离使增益仅归因中期。用Claude Sonnet 4.6生成25.76M/13.68M token语料,评ID/OOD行为、黑mail、涌现错位等,并以GPT-4o为裁判防自偏。
-
Q4: 论文做了哪些实验?
模型与基线:起点Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-Base,5条件(4 CMT + replay-only控制),每条件评post-MT/post-SFT/post-BFT共15检查点。数据集:自造ID 760题(每值20)、OOD 944题(滤41)、Blackmail n=100/点、Emergent 8题×50、Pressure 160+k4 75 MASK、Value Conflict 150、能力MMLU 969/ARC-E 750/piqa 750/GSM8K 200。指标:对齐选择率ACR、黑mail率、P(misaligned|coherent)、合规差、净对齐率、各能力准确率。显著性:CMT在ID/OOD/Blackmail持久优控(BFT黑mail -17.5pp),压力/冲突增益SFT后衰减,能力无损。
-
Q5: 有什么可以进一步探索的点?
可测更久或多步良性/恶意微调下CMT先验的衰减曲线,确认120B外更小或更大模型上中心性课程是否仍有效。DR在BFT反而增黑mail +9pp反常,需机制分析推理块是否被后训利用为捷径。可换非Anthropic宪法或动态中心性,并结合22的spec微调叠加看是否补压力抵抗缺口。论文留匹配检查点供机械分析,可探k1编码深度是否对应持久性神经证据。
2026-07-26
1 篇
Kimi K3:开放的前沿智能
HF 热门
高相关
MoE架构设计Scaling Law
Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence
判定:从零训练MoE基座模型并报告架构与训练配方
Kimi K3是一个2.8T参数的MoE基座模型,激活104B参数,具备原生视觉与百万token上下文。其采用Kimi Delta Attention、Attention Residuals与Stable LatentMoE等架构创新及精炼数据配方,较K2提升约2.5倍缩放效率。经后训练与基础设施协同设计,在长程编码、智能体、推理与视觉等任务达前沿水平并开源权重。
- 2.8T MoE基座模型,104B激活参数,原生视觉与百万上下文
- Delta Attention与Stable LatentMoE提升信息流与缩放效率2.5倍
- 算法系统协同与专家并行支撑训练,开源全量权重
📄 2607.24653
▲ 423
💬 9
📅 2026-07-26
✍ Kimi Team 等 402 人
We introduce Kimi K3, a 2.8T parameter Mixture-of-Experts model with 104 billion activated parameters, native vision capabilities, and a 1-million-token context window. Kimi K3 is built on Kimi Delta Attention and Attention Residuals, which improve information flow across sequence length and model depth. Together with Stable LatentMoE, which effectively activates 16 of 896 routed experts per token, and refined training and data recipes, these advances yield an approximately 2.5x improvement in overall scaling efficiency over Kimi K2. Post-training highlights reinforcement learning across general, agentic, and coding domains and multiple reasoning-effort levels, enabling compositional generalization and robust long-horizon execution. At 2.8T scale, Kimi K3 is supported by infrastructure advances in multiple areas: algorithm-system co-design for KDA, perfectly balanced expert-parallel training with efficient memory management, million-token agentic RL with persistent rollout and sandbox states, and deployment innovations. Extensive evaluations show that Kimi K3 achieves frontier-level performance across long-horizon coding, agentic, knowledge, reasoning, and vision tasks. While its overall performance still trails the most powerful proprietary models, namely Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol, Kimi K3 consistently outperforms other open and proprietary models evaluated in our suite. We release the full Kimi K3 model weights to facilitate future research and accelerate the broader deployment and adoption of frontier intelligence.
深度解读 · 五问五答
-
Q1: 这篇论文试图解决什么问题?
论文试图同时推进大模型预训练规模与测试时计算两个缩放轴至前沿。开源生态在测试时推理缩放上进展快,但预训练参数规模仍停留在1T级,与最强专有系统差距扩大。Kimi K3将预训练基础扩至2.8T参数MoE,并在1M上下文下缩放强化学习、推理努力与长程交互。目标是弥合开源与专有前沿模型在规模与智能上的鸿沟。
-
Q2: 有哪些相关研究?
推理模型方面:OpenAI o-series缩放RL与测试时推理,Anthropic扩展思考模型自适应分配思考预算并交织工具使用。DeepSeek-R1与Kimi K1.5证明大规模RL可从强预训练模型激发推理行为,Kimi K2.5 Agent Swarm将测试时缩放扩至并行智能体协调。架构方面:DeepSeek-V2引入MLA,Kimi Linear提出KDA与混合注意力,Attention Residuals(AttnRes)与LatentMoE、Stable LatentMoE提供深度与宽度缩放基础。MoonEP等系统工作支撑大规模MoE训练。
-
Q3: 论文如何解决这个问题?
预训练上采用2.8T参数原生多模态MoE(104B激活),含KDA+Gated MLA混合注意力、AttnRes跨层残差、Stable LatentMoE(896专家激活16)及Per-Head Muon,整体缩放效率较K2约提升2.5倍。后训练在通用/智能体/编程域做多推理努力级RL,并用多教师on-policy蒸馏合并为统一模型。基础设施上开发KDA系统协同设计、MoonEP平衡专家并行、百万token智能体RL的驻留rollout与可恢复沙箱等以支持训练与部署。
-
Q4: 论文做了哪些实验?
论文在长程编程、智能体、知识、推理与视觉任务基准套件上评估Kimi K3(图1主结果)。基线包括最强专有模型Claude Fable 5与GPT-5.6 Sol,以及其他开源与专有模型。指标为综合前沿性能对比:K3总体落后于前述两专有模型,但持续优于套件中其他所有评估模型。训练环境含可验证搜索、专业知识工作、软件工程与内核优化、多模态视觉工具推理、持久助手工作流、Web开发与自主执行等RL环境。
-
Q5: 有什么可以进一步探索的点?
可探索AttnRes在超深网络(L>>100)下块划分策略与跨块在线softmax合并的更优通信-计算权衡。KDA下界衰减g_min=-5与tile=16的BF16范围边界可系统搜索以进一步压缩状态或提速。Stable LatentMoE在>10^3专家时Quantile Balancing的理论收敛性及其与路由偏见更新的相互作用值得研究。原生视觉路径MoonViT-V2与多模态RL环境的可扩展性和长上下文视觉工具使用的泛化也待深入。